MANET Projects Examples using NS2

Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) project examples using NS2  are mentioned by us if you want to xplore more in this area then you can  approach us we will help you with customized results. Here are multiple Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) project examples using NS2 that explore various characteristics of MANETs as well as routing mechanisms, energy efficiency, security, mobility, and performance optimization:

  1. Performance Comparison of MANET Routing Protocols
  • Project Focus: Replicate and compare popular MANET routing protocols like AODV (Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector), DSR (Dynamic Source Routing), and OLSR (Optimized Link State Routing).
  • Objective: Analyse the performance of various protocols under changing mobility patterns, node density, and network size.
  • Metrics: Packet delivery ratio, end-to-end delay, routing overhead, and throughput.
  1. Energy-Efficient Routing in MANETs
  • Project Focus: Execute energy-aware routing features to decrease power utilization in mobile nodes.
  • Objective: Learn how energy-efficient routing elongates the battery life of nodes and prolong the network lifetime.
  • Metrics: Energy utilization, network lifetime, packet delivery ratio, and delay.
  1. Security-Aware Routing in MANETs
  • Project Focus: Mimic secure routing protocols that prevent attacks like black hole, wormhole, or Sybil attacks in MANETs.
  • Objective: Understand how integrating security features impacts network performance while making sure data integrity and privacy.
  • Metrics: Security leaks detection rate, packet delivery ratio, encryption overhead, and delay.
  1. Multi-Path Routing in MANETs
  • Project Focus: Establish and simulate multi-path routing protocols like AOMDV (Ad hoc On-Demand Multipath Distance Vector) to offer fault tolerance and load balancing.
  • Objective: Assess how multi-path routing improves network dependability, fault tolerance, and performance in MANETs.
  • Metrics: Packet delivery ratio, route discovery time, network reliability, and throughput.
  1. Mobility-Aware Routing in MANETs
  • Project Focus: Model the mobility-aware routing protocols that adjust to high node mobility and quickly varying network topologies.
  • Objective: Study how mobility-aware protocols optimize performance in highly dynamic environments like urban and vehicular ad-hoc networks (VANETs).
  • Metrics: Route stability, packet delivery ratio, handover delay, and network connectivity.
  1. QoS Routing in MANETs for Real-Time Applications
  • Project Focus: Accomplish QoS-aware routing protocols that prefer realistic traffic like VoIP or video streaming, over normal data traffic.
  • Objective: Make certain low latency, low packet loss, and high throughput for time-sensitive applications in MANETs.
  • Metrics: Latency, jitter, packet loss, throughput, and bandwidth usage.
  1. Cluster-Based Routing in MANETs
  • Project Focus: Imitate cluster-based routing protocols where mobile nodes are grouped into clusters with a cluster head that handles interaction with other clusters.
  • Objective: Understand how clustering increases scalability and energy productivity in large MANETs.
  • Metrics: Cluster formation time, routing overhead, energy utilization, and packet delivery ratio.
  1. Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Project Focus: Accomplish routing protocols like GPSR (Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing) and AODV in VANETs to assist vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communication.
  • Objective: Study the effects of high-speed mobility on routing performance in urban and highway traffic environments.
  • Metrics: Packet delivery ratio, delay, route discovery time, and system reliability.
  1. Fault-Tolerant Routing in MANETs
  • Project Focus: Implement fault-tolerant routing protocols that make certain continuous data transmission even when nodes or links fail.
  • Objective: Learn how fault-tolerant mechanisms enhance network flexibility and dependability in MANETs.
  • Metrics: Packet delivery ratio, fault recovery time, network reliability, and delay.
  1. Load Balancing in MANETs
  • Project Focus: Replicate load balancing strategies that allocate network traffic evenly through nodes and routes, ignoring congestion.
  • Objective: Evaluate how load balancing increases entire network performance and guard from bottlenecks in large-scale MANETs.
  • Metrics: Load dispersion, packet delivery ratio, network throughput, and delay.
  1. Energy Harvesting in MANETs
  • Project Focus: Model the energy-harvesting MANETs where nodes aggregate energy from renewable sources (like solar, wind) to power communication.
  • Objective: Study how energy harvesting prolongs the lifetime of MANETs and upholds communication in energy-constrained scenarios.
  • Metrics: Energy harvested, network lifetime, packet delivery ratio, and latency.
  1. Delay-Tolerant Routing in MANETs
  • Project Focus: Apply delay-tolerant routing protocols includes Epidemic Routing or Spray and Wait for MANETs in environments with intermittent connectivity.
  • Objective: Familiarize how these protocols manage long delays and interruptions in communication by depending on store-and-forward strategies.
  • Metrics: Message delivery ratio, delay, buffer occupancy, and routing overhead.
  1. Geographic Routing in MANETs
  • Project Focus: Mimic geographic routing protocols like GPSR, where data is directed in terms of the physical places of nodes.
  • Objective: Focus on how geographic routing increases efficiency and scalability in large, dynamic MANETs.
  • Metrics: Packet delivery ratio, routing overhead, delay, and location accuracy.
  1. Routing Protocols in MANETs with Dynamic Mobility Models
  • Project Focus: Prototype the routing protocols in MANETs using various mobility models like Random Waypoint, Gauss-Markov, and Manhattan Grid.
  • Objective: Analyze the influence of several mobility patterns on the performance of routing protocols.
  • Metrics: Packet delivery ratio, route discovery time, delay, and network stability.
  1. MANETs for Disaster Recovery Networks
  • Project Focus: Simulate a MANET developed for disaster recovery situations where infrastructure is damaged, and mobile nodes form an ad-hoc network to enable communication.
  • Objective: Concentrate how MANETs make sure consistent communication in areas with no infrastructure and fastly varying network topologies.
  • Metrics: Network connectivity, packet delivery ratio, fault tolerance, and delay.
  1. Trust-Based Secure Routing in MANETs
  • Project Focus: Execute trust-based secure routing protocols that assess node activities and trust levels to protect from mischievous behaviors in MANETs.
  • Objective: Understand how trust-based mechanisms guard against insider attacks and enhance whole network security.
  • Metrics: Trust evaluation precisely, packet delivery ratio, routing overhead, and security breach identification rate.
  1. MANETs for Military Communication
  • Project Focus: Mimic MANETs for military communication in battlefield environment, where nodes (soldiers or vehicles) interact in hostile environments with high mobility.
  • Objective: Learn how routing protocols make certain secure, consistent, and realistic communication in military networks.
  • Metrics: Packet delivery ratio, delay, security breach detection, and system reliability.
  1. Energy-Efficient Broadcasting in MANETs
  • Project Focus: Emulate energy-efficient broadcasting strategies that reduce energy utilization during data dissemination in MANETs.
  • Objective: Analyze how energy-efficient broadcasting methods decrease energy usage while making sure that all nodes acquire the broadcast message.
  • Metrics: Energy consumption, broadcast coverage, network lifetime, and latency.
  1. Hierarchical Routing in MANETs
  • Project Focus: Establish hierarchical routing protocols where nodes are planned into layers or regions to improve routing and scalability in large MANETs.
  • Objective: Study how hierarchical routing minimizes routing overhead and enhances the efficiency of data transmission.
  • Metrics: Routing overhead, packet delivery ratio, delay, and network scalability.
  1. Proactive vs. Reactive Routing in MANETs
  • Project Focus: Simulate proactive (like OLSR) and reactive (such as AODV) routing protocols to relate their performance in various network situations.
  • Objective: Evaluate the trade-offs amongst proactive and reactive routing according to the latency, routing overhead, and data transmission efficiency.
  • Metrics: Packet delivery ratio, routing overhead, end-to-end delay, and throughput.

Through the expounded manual, we presented the some example projects regarding the Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) including the execution, strategies and their evaluation process in the ns2 environment. We will also provide another set of examples in another manual, if needed.