ns2 project in oman
ns2 project in oman but no further optimizations are applied, and hence no large gain in parallelism can be expected . ns2 project in oman PARULEL’s execution is intended to be optimized by way of copy-and-constraining of rules distributed to different processing sites. ns2 projects in oman Optimizations may also be applied according to rule interdependence analysis as described in . Besides the issue of parallelism, ns2 project in oman RPL provides a declarative framework for conflict resolution like that proposed for ns2 project in oman PARULEL. However, it appears that the attributes of the firing groups used for ns2 project in oman conflict resolution are hard-coded; there is no actual way of accessing the conflict set itself.
Another system related to PARlJLEL is RDL . Although the execution ns2 project in oman semantics is defined as nondeterministic. choice for rule execution, control can bespecified separately from the rules by way of a control language based upon ns2 projects in oman regular expressions. In early work , one of the authors defined a rule language controlled by a separate control language based upon regular expressions, that specified sequential, ns2 project in oman repetitive alternative, and permutable rule executions. Although useful, the ns2 project in oman approach had a major problem in practice.
Occasionally the control expression being followed required the executionof a rule that had no instantiations. Ultimately, ns2 project in oman metarules were defined to resolve these “control conflicts”, which then quickly subsumed the entire regular expression language, i.e., metarules provided sufficient specification of c,ontrol. As we have noted, there is of course the problem with strict specification of control sequences by way of rule names.