ns2 project in Queensland
ns2 project in Queensland when all instances have been received, tokens representing the unredacted instances are reported back to the source BRPs or ns2 project in Queensland broadcast to all BRPs for firing. This depends on whether the database is fragmented or replicated. In our initial implementation, we use the latter scheme, for simplicity. This achieves “redact-all-possible” metarule semantics. This is deterministic and independent of ns2 project in Queensland instance generation order and MRP processing order.
This method ns2 project in Queensland scales with respect to the metarules. Even better performance may be extracted under some simple compile time optimizations, e.g, suppressing the transmission ns2 project in Queensland of “apparently relevant” instances which do not really have any possibility of matching the target metarule because of the presence of “inappropriate” constants. Such conditions can be determined at cornpile tirne and incorporated into the mapping tables at each BRP that direct the flow of generated instances to the MRP, one for each ns2 project in Queensland metarule. The LPM scheme features a metarule processor at ns2 project in Queensland each site, paired with each base rule processor.
The scheme is outlined as follows.Each site runs a restricted version of a rule program in a BRP, as usual, as well as a “coupled” MRP, that processes instances as they are generated using the two-phase algorithm, in pipeline fashion.The scheme is optimistic in the following sense. It relies on the generation of instances at each site such that a good fraction of redactions will take place by processing only the ns2 project in Queensland local instance D H , remote instances will not be needed. The unredacted instances are passed on to a “global” MRP for a final global filtering phase if needed. The ns2 project in Queensland global MRP also operates on the two-phase principle.